Support us on Paypal
Contact Us
Watch 2022-2023 online sermons » Derek Prince » Derek Prince - Foundations For A Christian Life

Derek Prince - Foundations For A Christian Life

Derek Prince - Foundations For A Christian Life
TOPICS: Bible Study

We're continuing now in Hebrews 6. We had just begun at the close of the previous session. If you turn to your outline it will be Page 6/1. This is the fifth 'let us' passage. And the 'let us' is 'press on to maturity or perfection.' If you don't understand what I'm talking about, turn back to your introductory material, page 0/3, and you'll see, on that page 12, 'let us' passages indicating corporate decision. The first four are all found in chapter 4. The fifth one is here at the beginning of chapter 6. The rest are still to come, I'll endeavor to point them out to you as we get to them. That's one of the threads that run through this epistle, these 'let us' passages. We're speaking now about the foundation doctrines of the Christian faith.

Perhaps I should just read or translate the first two verses. Wherefore leaving behind the word of the beginning of Christ [or the teaching of the basic truth of Christ], let us be carried on to maturity [or perfection], not laying again a foundation [then the writer lists six foundation doctrines] of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God [or in God], instructions about washings [or baptisms], laying on of hands, resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. Now we'll look at this list briefly. We did mention the first of these six doctrines, repentance from dead works. And it seemed to me the Lord caused me to lay considerable emphasis on this. I stated my observation that probably fifty percent of Christian problems are due to the fact that they don't have that first foundation doctrine of repentance in order.

Really, there is no way to go on to perfection or maturity if you haven't laid that first foundation of repentance. I said that repentance is not an emotion, it's not a ritual; it's a decision. It may be accompanied by much emotion or it may not. But the essential feature of repentance is the decision to turn away from rebellion, self-will, self-pleasing, living by our own standards; to turn around and face Almighty God and submit without reservation to His requirements. The Greek word that's used in the New Testament that's translated 'repentance' in secular Greek means 'to change your mind.' You were going to do a thing one way, you change your mind and do it another way. Well, that's true about living. You've been living one way, you change your mind, you're going to live another way. You've had your back to God, now you turn and face Him.

The Hebrew word translated 'repentance' very typically describes the outer action, the turning around, the 180-degree turn. Put the two together and you have repentance, an inner decision to change your way of living and a complete round-about turn. We all need to repent. In Acts 17 Paul says to the men of Athens, 'God commands all men everywhere to repent.' That leaves out no place and no person. Why do we all need to repent? The reason is stated in Isaiah 53:6. 'We all like sheep have gone astray: we have turned every one to his own way.' That's the root problem of humanity. Repentance deals with the root, it cuts the root. All sorts of other solutions can deal with branches on the tree or even cut the trunk down but repentance alone deals with the root, the stubborn self-will and self-pleasing. And only when that root has been dealt with can God really begin to have His way in our lives. I said repentance from dead works and we quoted Romans 14:23: whatsoever does not proceed from faith is sin.

So dead works are all works that do not proceed out of faith. Romans 1:17 says: The just [or the righteous] shall live by faith. There is no other basis for righteous living but faith. Whatever you do not do in faith cannot be righteous. You should eat in faith, that's what Paul talks about in Romans 14. He says if you don't eat out of faith, it's sin. You should sleep out of faith, talk out of faith, think out of faith, play games out of faith. Any time you're away from the faith basis, you're away from righteousness. Let me say, out of personal experience, the more faith you are exercising, the more life you have. You can play it safe and arrange your whole life so you're never challenged and never risk anything but you'll be half dead while you live.

We sometimes resent the challenges to our faith but they're out of God's mercy because only as we respond in faith do we have life. You want life, there's no way to have it but by faith. Young or old, whatever you may be, the life that's lived out of faith is a life that's full and rich. We're going on to the second of these foundation doctrines. Faith toward God. There's so much about faith, really, I'm not going to spend time on it because if I spend time on it I wouldn't have time for anything else. Let's just look at the one Scripture reference that's given there, Acts 20:20-21. Have you ever heard it said about Acts 20:20 that it's Acts 20/20 vision? how I did not shrink from declaring to you anything that was profitable, and teaching you publicly and from house to house. That's a full vision of reaching the people with the gospel. "solemnly testifying to both Jews and Greeks of repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ".

That's the basis. Repentance toward God and then faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. You really cannot truly put your faith in Jesus Christ unless you have first repented. You can have a semblance of faith, it will see you through, but there will come some experience in your life when that superficial, external faith will crumble. And you'll wonder what went wrong with God. I want to tell you, nothing ever goes wrong with God. The problem was you hadn't laid some of the foundation stones. The third, instruction about baptisms. Some of your translations say 'washings.' In fact, the one we have here, the New American Standard, says 'washings.' The New International Version says 'instruction about baptisms.' You say, 'Which does it mean?' You're facing a problem which is difficult to think yourself into. The truth of the matter is, it means both.

You see, Greek has this word which means both. We don't have it in English. You ask a Greek, 'Which do you mean?' he says, 'I just mean that.' I don't know whether I can communicate that to you. My field of study was the meaning of words before I got converted and so it's particularly close to me. There are many such examples. There's a word in Russian that means 'world' and it means 'peace.' So you tell a Russian, 'Which do you mean?' and he says, 'I just mean that word.' So you say, 'Did the writer of Hebrews mean washings or baptisms?' He meant what he said. The Greek word is baptismos, which means both. However, it's obvious, I think, that he did not have in mind merely the physical act of washing your hands as the Jewish people did and all that kind of, shall we say, ritualistic washing because it's included in these foundation doctrines. Therefore, I feel it's absolutely clear that it includes what we would call baptism, which is actually the Greek word, baptismos.

The word means literally 'to dip something in water so that it's covered.' If you run water over your arm, you're baptizing your arm. If you sprinkle water on your forehead, you are not baptizing your forehead. There is a good Greek word for 'to sprinkle,' which is used about Moses sprinkling the people and the book of the law with the blood, but it's not baptize. If you want to know what it is, it's ?rhantize?. So some people practice baptism and some people practice ?rhantism?. But it is not accurate to call baptism something that doesn't immerse. Now let's look at just a few of these Scriptures because they'll be helpful illustrations. I've not put in many, just Acts 1:5, words spoken by Jesus shortly before He took His farewell of His disciples: 'John baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with [or in] the Holy Spirit not many days from now.'

Notice the word baptized is used twice in that verse. There are two baptisms there spoken of. One is John's baptism with water, the other is the baptism that's administered only by Jesus Christ with the Spirit or, preferably, in the Spirit. So there are two baptisms that play an important role in the New Testament. Then in Acts 2:38 Peter said to the people who had asked, 'What shall we do?' Peter said: 'Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.' There we have yet another form of baptism. Baptism in the name of Jesus Christ, baptism in water. But not identical with John's baptism because John's baptism was not in anybody's name. This baptism is in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Also, Jesus Himself said, 'Baptize in the name of the Father, and the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.'

All I'm pointing out is we have there three different baptisms: two in water, one in the Holy Spirit: all of which play an important part in the truth of the New Testament. So instruction about baptisms probably should cover all of those. The fourth, laying on of hands. I think people might be surprised that laying on of hands would be considered a foundation doctrine. All I can say is that first of all, it's there, which settles the question: for me at any rate. Second, I think laying on of hands is something that links various different things that otherwise would not be linked together. So, its real function is to bring things together, to relate things that would not otherwise be related. I've given you some examples there, let's look at them quickly. Mark 16. Verses: 17-18 Jesus said, 'Go and preach the gospel.' These signs shall follow them that believe: in My name [et cetera, and then He concludes verse 18] they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.

So there is one purpose of laying hands on people in the name of Jesus, to bring healing to the sick. Now there's an alternative practice in James 5, the anointing with oil by the elders. And in James 5, we don't need to turn there, it does not actually speak about laying on of hands. It seems to me from the context that the passage in Mark is primarily in evangelism. Go and preach, and these signs will attest. Whereas the passage in James 5 where it speaks about 'calling for the elders of the church' is in the context of church life. I don't believe we need to make a hard-and-fast separation, but there are two different emphases. Then we have a number of Scriptures in Acts. Not all of them that are in Acts by any means. Acts 8:17-19. This happened in Samaria after Philip had been there; then the apostles John and Peter came down and began to finish off the work that Philip had started. I think it's interesting that it took one evangelist to get the whole thing going but it took two apostles to establish the church. Acts 8:17 and following. Then they began laying their hands on them [that believed in Samaria], and they were receiving the Holy Spirit.

Now when Simon saw that the Spirit was bestowed through the laying on of the apostles' hands, he offered them money. Simon was a smart man in some ways, and he saw the way these people get it is when the apostles lay their hands on them. Of course, he was wrong to offer money but he said: 'Give this authority to me as well, so that everyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit.' There's another biblical, scriptural use for the laying on of hands, is receiving the Holy Spirit. Let's go on to Acts 9:17. This is in the city of Damascus, Paul has arrived there, he has had his encounter with the Lord on the way, he can't see, he's not eating or drinking. The Lord spoke to Ananias to go and pray for him. Ananias departed and entered the house, and after laying his hands on him [that's Saul] said, 'Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road by which you were coming, has sent me so that you may regain your sight, and be filled with the Holy Spirit.'

Notice both purposes there. Healing and receiving the Holy Spirit. In Acts 19:6, this is Ephesus, the start of the great move of God there. About a dozen men who only knew about John's baptism had then received Christian baptism. Incidentally, note the difference between the two. John's baptism was not any longer valid. Then Paul laid his hands upon them that they might receive the baptism in the Holy Spirit and it says: When Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they began speaking with tongues and prophesying. I would like also to point out to you two other passages that are not listed, you might want to write them down: 1 Timothy 4:14 and 5:22. This introduces us to a different purpose for laying on of hands.

First Timothy 4:14: Do not neglect the spiritual gift within you, which was bestowed upon you through prophetic utterance with the laying of hands by the presbytery. There the laying on of hands was for the bestowing of a gift. Incidentally, the New American Standard says 'spiritual gift,' but the word spiritual isn't there. I'm interested to see what this one says. Excuse me just a moment. First Timothy 4:14: 'Do not neglect your gift which was given unto you.' So they don't say 'spiritual gift.' Now in Romans 1 Paul says that he desires that he might impart a spiritual gift to the Christians at Rome, and the word spiritual is there. But in 1 Timothy 4:14 it isn't there, but the translators put it in. In other words, they made an assumption. I don't agree with their assumption. I have my own theory, that's why I'm saying all this. I believe that the gift that Timothy received through the laying on of the hands of Paul and the elders was the gift of apostleship.

You don't have to believe me, but if I had time I could take you through a lot of passages of Scripture which I believe substantiate that. I don't believe it can be proved, it's an inference. But at any rate, it is scriptural to impart gifts, both gifts of the Holy Spirit and other gifts, with the laying on of hands. Notice, in this case there was prophecy. My understanding of it would be that Paul was there in Lystra which was, I think, Timothy's home church. The elders said, 'He's a good young man.' Paul felt a quickening in him and he said, 'How about letting him travel with me?' And they said, 'All right, but let's pray for him.' So Paul and the elders laid hands on him and a prophecy came. The prophecy was, who knows, but I think it was it contained the word apostle. But Timothy never really had much chance to get a swollen head because a lot of things happened to keep him humble.

Now, if you like to turn to 1 Timothy 1 also, verse 18. 1 Timothy 1:18: This command I entrust to you, Timothy, my son, in accordance with the prophesies previously made concerning you, that by them you may fight the good fight. You see, that fills in the picture for me. When they laid hands on Timothy and prayed over him, prophecy came that kind of outlined Timothy's future ministry and calling. Now Timothy's in a rather difficult place, he has heavy responsibilities. Paul warns him: Don't yield to the spirit of timidity, and he says, 'Remember the prophecies that came when we laid hands on you? Live up to them.' I've got this in my little book Laying on of Hands, this interpretation of this passage. Interestingly enough, years later I met a brother, a minister in New Zealand, and he told me that when he was here in the United States in a Bible school, prophecy went before on him that he was to do this and that. Went back to his own country of New Zealand, nothing seemed to be working out, he got discouraged.

One day he picked up my book, and was reading about Timothy being encouraged by the prophecies that went on him beforehand and he remembered the prophecies that had gone before about him. He stepped out in faith and God honored his faith and his commitment. So all this is very real. And I think now you can see maybe a little better why I say that laying on of hands is the kind of 'linking up' doctrine. It links ministries, it links gifts, it's a means of transferring authority, it's a means of making appointments in the church. It keeps things going. First Timothy 5:22, just as a final example, speaking about elders to Timothy, who has this responsibility: 1 Timothy 5:22: Do not lay hands upon anyone too hastily. How many of you have heard the saying, 'It's easier to lay hands on than lay hands off'?

Well, that's what Paul is saying. Don't do it too quickly. He makes a remarkable statement. and thus share responsibility for the sin of others; keep yourself free from sin. In other words, if Timothy had rashly laid hands on a man and sent him forth as an elder and that man had got into some kind of moral trouble and involved members of the flock, Timothy would have shared some of the responsibility for those people who were hurt by that man. It's a very solemn thought. If we give authority to people, we share a measure of responsibility for what they do with that authority. I don't know of any case I can think of where it has been done too slowly. But I can think of a whole lot of cases where if I or others had the opportunity, we would do it much less quickly. We're going back to page 6/1.

The fifth of these foundation doctrines: resurrection of the dead. A very, very thrilling and beautiful study, one that every Christian should have somehow ingrained in him because, dear friends, if you haven't already been there, there will be a time in your life where you're going to need to know if you really believe in the resurrection of the dead. When the Lord called my first wife home after thirty years of marriage, I had preached for years but I had to ask myself, Do I really believe I'll see her again? Thank God, I was able to say yes. But you can't fool circumstances with a superficial assent to doctrine. You've got to know if you really believe it. Let's look at just the two Scriptures there that I have included. They're both from Romans.

Romans 4:23-25. Now not for his sake [that's Abraham's sake] only was it written, that 'it was reckoned to him' [that is his faith was reckoned to him as righteousness], but for our sake also, to whom it will be reckoned [our faith will be reckoned as righteousness], as those who believe in Him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead, He who was delivered up because of our transgressions, and was raised up because of our justification. That's very important. He was raised so that God might justify us, acquit us, reckon us righteous. Righteousness doesn't come through His death, it comes through His resurrection. It's not enough to believe that Jesus died, you have to believe that He rose again. Romans 10:9, just not a complete sentence. that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you shall be saved. You cannot be saved if you do not believe that Jesus was raised from the dead. It's essential.

I think there's another Scripture I'd like to add in 1 Corinthians 15. How many of you know what's the theme of 1 Corinthians 15? Resurrection, that's right. Just let's look in the middle of the chapter, verses 13-14: But if there is no resurrection of the dead, not even Christ has been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain. If there isn't any resurrection, why make such a fuss about it? Verse 16: For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. Then those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. [That's a terrible thought.] If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied. I wish some people would hear that statement.

I've heard people say Christianity is so wonderful that even if there was nothing beyond the grave it would be worthwhile. That's not what Paul says. He says we'd be a deluded set of idiots if Christ wasn't raised. It's so important. I often quote a little hymn or song that I have on a record sung by a Jewish singer who is one of my special favorites that is not a Jewish song. Its title is He Arose. But what always grips me is just a little part of the chorus. I can never say it without tears coming in my eyes, it's an amazing thing. 'May the book of life never close till the whole world knows He arose.' That's the thing everybody is entitled to know, that Jesus rose from the dead. That's the thing that makes history. The most exciting event in all human history is the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.

When you face death face to face, you know death is ugly, death is cruel, death is pitiless, death is irresistible. Thank God somebody beat death. It makes all of the difference to me because none of us are going to live forever. If you think you are, you are deceiving yourself. And furthermore, it's not going to be nearly as long as forever. You'd be amazed how quickly the years fly. The further on you get in life, the quicker they go. The sixth of these doctrines, eternal judgment. You'll notice that these last two doctrines are beyond time. They're in that great unknown, the unseen realm beyond death. The truth of the gospel spans from eternity to eternity. Let me add that as far as I know, Christianity is the only religion that even claims to deal with our past. I don't know any other religion that even makes that claim. That places it in a category entirely by itself.

Let's look at what it says about eternal judgment. I think I need to explain something first. The word eternal means 'that which is out of time.' It doesn't mean that it goes on forever and ever primarily, but it means that it's a different kind of existence. Eternal life is not just a very long life, like we have; it's a life of a different order. My impression is in eternity the past, the present and the future in some sense intermingle. I don't know that I can explain that. Eternal judgment is judgment that takes place after time has ended. It is appointed unto men once to die and after this what? Judgment. Never forget that. There are also in the Bible many examples of historical judgment. Those are judgments that are worked out in the course of human history.

If you don't understand that, there will be many apparent conflicts in the teaching of Scripture that will confuse you. I'll show you perhaps one or two. We are not talking about historical judgment; we're talking about eternal judgment, judgment that takes place after you step out of time and into eternity. There are various pictures in the New Testament; we won't dwell on them too long. Essentially, the way to distinguish the various judgments that lie ahead is to focus on the type of seat that the judge occupies. There are primarily two, what they call the judgment seat, judgment of Christ, and the great white throne judgment. The difference that you can focus your mind on is that the seat occupied by the judge is different.

Let's look at the judgment seat judgment first in Romans 14:10-12. The Greek word that I'm translating judgment seat is bema. It was used of what Pontius Pilate was on when Jesus stood before him for judgment. But you, why do you judge your brother? Or you again, why do you regard your brother with contempt? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God. The bema. We. That's believers, not unbelievers. For it is written, 'As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to Me, and every tongue shall give praise to God.' So then each one of us shall give account of himself to God. Paul is saying, Why be so busy judging everybody else? You're going to have enough to take care of giving account of yourself to God. And remember, you're going to have to stand there. Don't imagine because you're a Christian you will not face this judgment.

In fact, you will face it because you are a Christian. And then in 2 Corinthians 5:10: 2 Corinthians 5:10: For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ [we, Christians], that each one may be recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. It impresses me that there are only two categories. Everything we do is either good or bad. And if it isn't good, it's bad. And we're going to have to explain it to the Lord Jesus Christ. His eyes are like a flame of fire, His feet like bronze burning in a furnace. Out of His mouth goes a two-edged sword. I don't think excuses will avail, or half-truths. Everything in us will be laid bare with one glance of His eyes. We're going to have to give an account of everything we've done in the body. No wonder Paul said, 'Knowing the terror of the Lord, we persuade man.' Let's look at one other picture, and this is no longer the judgment seat judgment, this is the great white throne. Revelation 20.

John Wesley has a sermon on this Scripture; he calls it 'The Great Assign.' Revelation 20:11 and following. I saw a great white throne and Him who sat upon it, from whose presence earth and heaven fled away, and no place was found for them [there's nowhere left to hide]. And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne,. Notice, though they were resurrected they were still dead, dead in sin. and the books were opened; . That's the books of the records of everybody's lives. and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged from the things which were written in the books, according to their deeds. [Not according to their denominations.] And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were judged, every one of them according to their deeds. And death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

Notice the second judgment, the great white throne judgment, is essentially or primarily a judgment of condemnation. It's assigning the wicked to their final place. But the judgment seat of Christ for believers is not a judgment for condemnation, because there is no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. It's a judgment to assess our service and determine our reward and, I suppose, our standing in the kingdom. There are also in the Bible historical judgments. Just to have a clear understanding I'd like to speak for a few moments about historical judgments. Historical judgments are God's judgments which are worked out in time, in history. Sometimes there may be a conflict. For instance, just to give an example, a man may commit murder and in history he has to pay the penalty, be executed. But between the time of committing murder and the time of being executed he had an encounter with the Lord Jesus Christ, his sins were forgiven, his name was written in the book of life. And so his historical judgment is negative but his eternal judgment is gloriously positive.

So you see there's a kind of built in possibility of tension between the two. Let's look at Exodus 20:3-5. This is part of what we call the Ten Commandments. In fact, it's the first part. Exodus 20:3-5. The Lord is speaking: You shall have no other gods before me or beside me. You shall not make for yourself an idol, or likeness of what is in heaven above or on earth beneath or in the water under earth. You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate me. That's very clear that certain sins bring God's judgment beyond the generation of the person who committed the sin. In fact, for three or four continuing generations. I believe that the particular sin is what we would call today being involved in the occult.

That is, having some other god beside the true God. I've dealt with many, many people in whose lives one of the factors was the sin of an ancestor. And we had to face up to this fact that God's historical judgments were being worked out in their lives as a result of the sins of ancestors. Now that's historical, not necessarily eternal. If you turn to Ezekiel 18, the difference is brought out very clearly. Ezekiel 18:20. The person who sins will die. The Hebrew says the soul who sins will die. the son will not bear the punishment of the father's iniquity; nor will the father bear the punishment of the son's iniquity. The righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

Now there is no conflict between that statement and the one in Exodus because they're two different kinds of judgment. Exodus is speaking of historical judgment worked out in history. We know that to some extent they are true, we cannot deny them. An alcoholic's child starts with disadvantages that are not the disadvantages of a man who is, say, a university professor. That's just two examples. There's no getting away from the fact that in this life what our parents were and did affects, in some measure, the course of our life. That's realism. To say otherwise is just to put your head in the sand, which is not what ostriches do. That's a slander against the ostrich. I'm always out to defend the ostrich against that statement. On the other hand, when we stand before the eternal judgment of God it won't be what our father or mother did, it will be what we have done that we will be judged on. I hope that's at least in some measure clear. We cannot escape, in a sense, either judgment.

History is, in a sense, the record of God's judgment. If you study the history of Israel, it's one long record of divine judgment worked out in human history. And some of them have taken thousands of years to be worked out. It's frightening. We now go back to Hebrews 6:3 which says: This we will do if God permits. Now, I can't remember whether we went into this, but let's go into it again briefly. It's speaking about moving on to perfection. Let us move on. And then the writer says we'll do this if God permits. Why wouldn't God permit? Surely God would be happy for everybody to move on to perfection. You can't go any further in the building until you get what the American's call a permit and the English call a permit. But anyhow, you know what I'm talking about.

That's true in the natural. Until your foundation has been certified by the building inspector you cannot built any further. God has his building inspector. God says foundation incomplete. Where's that first stone, repentance? I won't sign the certificate. You can't go on. That's one among various reasons why millions of Christians are still messing around with the foundation. They've never had a permit to go any further. Some of them do go further, and along comes God's building inspector and says tear it down, start again. That's a reality. I venture to say to you here tonight, anybody who hears this, if you don't have your foundation in order you will never go further. That's a final, categorical statement. God doesn't have favorites. He's not to be bribed. You can't slip the inspector something on the side and get away with it.

Now, two practical applications. Number one, we need to lay the foundation once for all, then go on to complete the building. One mistake you can make is keep on laying the foundation. You only need to lay it once. Then go on. That's 'let us go on.' But, the other application is if we have not laid a proper foundation we will not obtain a permit to continue construction. So there we are. I've put it another way many times. You do not get graduated from grade 2 in God's school till you've passed the test. It isn't like the modern educational system where promotion is automatic. That isn't education, how many of you know that? That's a substitute. God doesn't have substitute education for his kids. You get tired of the lessons in grade 2, well, pass the test and you'll move on.
Are you Human?:*